← Back to Blog

Experimenting with pricing as a marketplace

2024-09-13 · Dominic Quirin
Marketplace pricing strategies and experimentation techniques for optimal revenue

Starting with an initial hypothesis and iterating toward an optimal price point is essential for attracting not just a large number of customers, but the right kind of customers. This principle holds true for any business, but for marketplaces, the dynamics are significantly more complex.

In a standard SaaS business, you might A/B test your pricing page and call it a day. In a marketplace, you are balancing the incentives of two distinct user groups – supply and demand – where a change for one side can have cascading effects on the other.

The Unique Challenges of Marketplace Pricing

In a marketplace setting, especially when your revenue model is based on transaction commissions, adjusting pricing isn’t straightforward. Unlike an e-commerce store where you can change the price of a t-shirt overnight, marketplace pricing often involves contractual agreements, long-standing user expectations, and the delicate balance of trust.

Many changes can only be applied to new users – for instance, increasing your cut from future transactions – or they might require renegotiation with existing partners. This rigidity can make pricing feel static, and as a result, some leading marketplaces have kept their commission structures unchanged for years, fearing that any move might upset the apple cart.

But despite these hurdles, experimenting with pricing is not just worthwhile – it’s crucial. Stagnant pricing models can leave money on the table and fail to capture the value you’re creating as your platform matures. Let me illustrate this with an example from my own experience with MentorCruise.

Case Study: MentorCruise’s Pricing Evolution

In 2020, MentorCruise underwent two significant pricing changes that reshaped our business trajectory. At first glance, these changes might not seem monumental, but they had profound impacts on growth, retention, and user satisfaction.

1. Transition to a Monthly Subscription Model

In March 2020, we decided to shift from offering weekly and one-off rates to a monthly subscription model.

The Problem: Previously, mentees could pay on a weekly basis. While this lowered the barrier to entry, the frequent billing cycle led to higher churn rates as users grew weary of constant transactions. Users would sign up for a week, get busy, and cancel immediately to avoid the next charge, often before seeing the full value of the mentorship. It created a transactional mindset rather than a relational one.

The Solution: We extended the billing cycle to a month. By changing the default billing period, we shifted the user mindset from a “quick fix” to a “committed engagement.” We aligned the payment frequency with the value delivery frequency (mentorship takes time).

The Result: We observed that mentorships lasted longer, providing more value to both mentors and mentees. This change wasn’t just about altering a payment schedule – it led to a 600% growth over six months. LTV (Lifetime Value) skyrocketed because retention improved drastically.

The Challenge (and Fix): However, implementing this wasn’t as simple as tweaking a Stripe plan. We faced challenges, particularly concerning our mentors.

With the new monthly model, mentors experienced delays in accessing their funds. Under the weekly system, mentors received payments within seven days. The monthly subscription meant they might wait up to a month to receive their earnings. This was a significant adjustment, and it required proactive communication.

To address this, we prioritized proactive communication and transparency:

This transparency was key in maintaining trust and satisfaction among our mentors.

2. Revising the Fee Structure

By September 2020, we realized that our existing fee structure was limiting our ability to grow and innovate. We were taking a 20% cut from each transaction, and mentors set their own pricing. While this model was transparent, it had drawbacks.

The Problem:

The Solution: We executed a comprehensive migration to a new pricing model:

The Result:

Key Strategies for Effective Pricing Changes

Based on these experiences, here are some actionable strategies for implementing pricing changes in a marketplace without causing a revolt.

1. Build Flexibility into Your Pricing Structure

When launching a new marketplace, design a pricing model that doesn’t constrain your future options. Hard-coding a “10%” fee into your database and user agreements is a recipe for future headaches.

Example: If you’re required to change partner agreements for pricing adjustments, consider undertaking a one-time migration to a more flexible model. This was crucial for us at MentorCruise to avoid constant renegotiations.

2. Provide Options and Communicate Changes Clearly

When changes affect your partners, transparency is your best defense against churn.

3. Explore Alternative Revenue Models

Don’t limit your marketplace to a simple commission model. The most successful marketplaces often layer multiple revenue streams to capture different types of value.

4. Prepare for Increased Support Demand

Any pricing change will likely lead to an uptick in customer support inquiries.

Psychological Pricing in Marketplaces

One area that is often overlooked in marketplace pricing is the psychology of the price tag. When individual suppliers set their own prices, you often end up with a messy array of numbers like $52, $104, or $20.

As a platform owner, you can nudge this behavior:

Dynamic Pricing: The “Uber” Model for Everyone

While “Surge Pricing” is famous, dynamic pricing can be subtle and effective for many marketplaces, not just ride-sharing.

Supply/Demand Balancing: If you have too many buyers and not enough sellers in a specific category (e.g., “Logo Design”), you can automatically increase the minimum price or the service fee for that category.

Time-Based Pricing: If your marketplace involves booking time (tutors, cleaners), consider higher rates for peak hours.

The “Grandfathering” Trap

While I mentioned grandfathering as a good strategy to appease existing users, be careful not to create a permanent “legacy class” of users who are unprofitable.

If you lock in a 0% fee for your first 100 users forever, and they become your biggest sellers, you are effectively subsidizing your own competition. Instead of “forever,” offer a “legacy period” (e.g., 12 or 24 months). This gives them ample time to adjust or increase their own prices to cover the difference, without anchoring your business to an outdated model indefinitely.

Executing the Price Change: A Communication Template

Communicating a price increase is terrifying. Here is a structure that works:

  1. The “Value Sandwich”: Start with value, state the price change, end with value.
  2. The Reason: Be honest. “To continue investing in our support team…” is better than silence.
  3. The Timeline: Give at least 30 days notice.
  4. The CTA: Give them a way to ask questions.

Sample Email Subject: Investing in the future of [Marketplace Name]

“Hi [Name],

Over the past year, we’ve helped you generate [Amount] in sales and launched features like [Feature A] and [Feature B]. To continue building the best home for your business, we are updating our fee structure on [Date].

The new fee will be [X]. This change allows us to launch [New Benefit] next month.

As a thank you for being an early partner, you will keep your current rate for another 6 months.”

Why Pricing Flexibility Matters in Marketplaces

Embracing a flexible pricing strategy shouldn’t be hindered by the marketplace model. Instead, pricing should be a dynamic tool that enables you to:

How Twosided Can Help You Nail Your Pricing

Experimenting with pricing is risky if you’re flying blind. You need to know exactly how a 1% increase in fees affects your GMV, your user churn, and your bottom line.

This is where Twosided comes in. We are an analytics platform built specifically for marketplaces.

Don’t guess with your revenue. Start your free trial with Twosided today and turn your marketplace data into actionable pricing strategies.